Skip to content

Linguistic Purism: Anglish

hen translating Russian specialized papers, I am always amazed the number of terms appear to be English cognates or maybe borrowings, for instance, tekhnichesky “technical,” plutony “plutonium,” izotopy “isotopes.” Does not Russian have the own Slavic styles of its for these terms? But as much as borrowing is concerned, it seems English has its own huge lexical debt.

Many native speakers of English do not stop to think about the scope of foreign influence on the language of theirs, though it’s significant. Approximately 25% of English vocabulary is in fact native. The rest comes from French (thanks mostly to the Norman Conquest), Latin and Greek (mostly coming from the Renaissance), along with other languages (via colonialism). Remember that when we speak about what comprises indigenous English, we’re talking about a certain Germanic language which supplanted that which was spoken on the British Isles prior to the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes drove out the Romans, who subsequently invaded the Celts.

Simply because the majority of the borrowings of ours came out of the language spoken at court or perhaps with the launch of new ideas in music, literature, art, philosophy, or science, there’s constantly been an inclination to look at terms created from French, Latin, and Greek as even more “literate” or perhaps professional compared to indigenous words. Consequently, for instance, instructions on a medication bottle will very likely instruct the user to talk to a physician instead of to ask a physician.

This tendency to make use of foreign words rather compared to native ones usually causes a backlash. The French policy of discouraging the usage of international (especially English) text in the words of theirs is, if not efficient, at minimum popular. And Pushkin, that made sizable contributions to Russian, introduced new words by calquing overseas ones (translating every component of the term – prefix, root, suffix – bit by bit) instead of by borrowing.

Because of the disproportionate length of borrowing suffered by English, it’s rarely surprising it’s additionally had the share of its of authors that argued for working with indigenous words, among them Charles Dickens, Thomas Hardy, and George Orwell. They felt that international borrowings were pretentious and made English unnecessarily complicated also inaccessible to the typical individual. They argued that absolutely great indigenous phrases existed or even may be produced to fill in any semantic gaps.

As an outcome, a movement known as Anglish has sprung up through the years, where words of international origin are replaced with people from Anglo Saxon. From the gentle form of its, Anglo-Saxon words are chosen over of international ones, the target just being making English much more accessible to the typical individual. A good example could be going with the term unlawful rather than illegal.

In the extreme form of its, foreign borrowings are stayed away from completely. Anywhere gaps are present, brand new phrases are produced by numerous ways, for instance, by changing the term literature with bookcraft. As severe Anglish entails resurrecting obsolete words or maybe coining brand new ones, it’s arguably less about accessibility and much more of a fascinating intellectual workout. If you are interested in what is native and what is not, you are able to find a great deal of information on the site The Anglish Moot. Should you love word puzzles, you might like deciphering the articles that’re available there, that are composed in Anglish on a number of subjects.

In order to illustrate the effect that borrowing has experienced on the English language, I’ll be looking at in my upcoming blog site a relatively popular essay initially posted in 1989 by the late science fiction author Poul Anderson, called “Uncleftish Beholding” (“Atomic Theory”). Anderson claims the write-up is founded on the idea that “the Norman conquest of England hardly ever happened,” though obviously it will be much more right to suggest the portion is a rejection of all the overseas borrowings (including Greek and Latin, not merely French). Stay tuned to discover what we can try to have named words like plutonium, particle, and atom, had the English been effective isolationists.